Jump to content


Photo

cam belt came off after accident


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 tmh983

tmh983

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:newcastle

Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:02 PM

Have been helping someone out who had a front end crash in a gen3 lib. Unfortunately one of the radiator fans got pushed back and smashed the cam cover and the belt has come off.

On the weekend we are going to see if we can refit the belt and then do a compression test. It doesn't seem to have damaged any of the pulleys, but I won't know for sure until I can get it apart and have a look.

Is there any chance at all that it won't have bent the valves or is it pretty much guaranteed to have done damage?

#2 alexGT

alexGT

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:wollongong

Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:05 PM

EJ motors are interference motors. if the motor was running at the time you will be in trouble.

MY07 GT spec B

 


#3 Xon

Xon

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1535 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:12 PM

EJ motors are interference motors. if the motor was running at the time you will be in trouble.

^^^
Might have some bent valves and rooted pistons going on...

I would have gone to the kitchen, collected a brown bag, dropped my dacks, pinched off a loaf in said bag, done up dacks, stickytaped bag, placed bag in envelope, and mailed it right to your face for being such a tool.


It's ok, sometimes when we herp, we also derp.


#4 Scott

Scott

    Formerly LiBeRtY Gx AwD

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1498 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:16 PM

if the car stalled before the belt came off you might be alright happened to a mates wrx

he ran up the back of someone but the car stalled as he hit the brakes with no clutch, the hit made the belt came off but engine wasnt running


if the car ran until the belt came off then it would have stalled because of internal damage :(

#5 Jimbo

Jimbo

    Livin' the Legacy

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2771 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:B'town

Posted 12 April 2012 - 09:14 PM

AFAIK the N/A motors are non-interference.

I had a timing belt tensioner explode while i was driving around in my old wagon and shit went everywhere. Car came to a griding halt. Slapped on a new belt and it was apples.

Your mate may be lucky. I reckon it would be quicker to whip the intake/zorst manifold off and have a look that way.

'04 Liberty GT Premium "The Sprog Chariot"


#6 tmh983

tmh983

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:newcastle

Posted 12 April 2012 - 09:15 PM

Hmm, i've got no idea if the engine had stalled on impact, but I know for sure the guy has been trying to crank it on the starter since the accident, so theres is probably a good chance the valves would be bent by now.
I guess there is an extreme outside chance that the valves would have come to rest in just the perfect positions so they are clear of the pistons, but thats proably just wishful thinking.
Ah well, I guess this crash is gonna cost the guy a lot more than he first realised.

#7 93tzlegacy

93tzlegacy

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1470 posts

Posted 12 April 2012 - 09:19 PM

just put the belt back on, will be good 99% of the time.

Benny's Custom Works supplying OEM new, aftermarket new and used parts at the best prices 

0415 522 512

wagonsyndicatesig.jpg


#8 tmh983

tmh983

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:newcastle

Posted 12 April 2012 - 09:23 PM

wikipedia says all ej's post 1996 were interference engines. Will have to wait until saturday to find out the extent of the damage.

#9 bobbyjimmy

bobbyjimmy

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1287 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canberra

Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:05 PM

wikipedia says all ej's post 1996 were interference engines


Only early EJ20/22's are non-interference.

2002 Outback - it's gone...


#10 alexGT

alexGT

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:wollongong

Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:38 PM

I know of a gen2 with gt-b motor that had a very small hit and it bent valves.

you really aren't going to know until you put a belt on and try?

MY07 GT spec B

 


#11 tmh983

tmh983

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:newcastle

Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:12 PM

yeah thats right, no point speculating really. We will cross our fingers and put the belt back on tomorrow and see what happens.

#12 tmh983

tmh983

    Regular Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:newcastle

Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:27 PM

so the verdict is........... one farked engine.

The damage was a lot worse than I first realised. After I took the bumper off I could see the full extent of the damage. Looks like he's hit a towbar or something.
Posted Image


With the cam cover off, you can see the belt has come off the back side of the crank pulley and was completely jammed.
Posted Image


The belt is r/s
Posted Image


I rotated the cam pulleys by hand to a position where both valves should have been closed and ran a compression test. LH bank is fine, RH bank has zero compression on both cyls.

The upside of this for me, is that I am probably going to buy this wreck and use it for a cheap manual conversion for my car. its only got 104,000 k's on it and the dual range box is tight as. Plus theres plenty of good parts i can wreck out to whoever wants them.

#13 Scott

Scott

    Formerly LiBeRtY Gx AwD

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1498 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:44 PM

damn

good for you tho haha




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users