which turbos are bigger
#1
Posted 04 August 2011 - 02:04 PM
Which set of turbo is bigger or higher flow capacity, adm 32/33 or jdm 26/27?
#2
Posted 04 August 2011 - 02:06 PM
#3
Posted 04 August 2011 - 02:35 PM
MY02 LIBERTY B4 - LAST DYNO'D @ 375.4KW-ATW 403.5KW-ATW
Next Dyno will be 400+
#4
Posted 04 August 2011 - 02:35 PM
MY02 LIBERTY B4 - LAST DYNO'D @ 375.4KW-ATW 403.5KW-ATW
Next Dyno will be 400+
#5
Posted 04 August 2011 - 03:42 PM
#6
Posted 04 August 2011 - 03:47 PM
#7
Posted 04 August 2011 - 07:03 PM
#8
Posted 04 August 2011 - 07:11 PM
Howver if you can source the whole tract you can use it. I couldnt becuase i had a Gen2.
'04 Liberty GT Premium "The Sprog Chariot"
#9
Posted 04 August 2011 - 08:03 PM
The difference comes in the wheel design and the 33 has a larger, less restrictive intake so theoretically it can be more efficient..
the turbine housings are also slightly different aswell, which makes the BIGGEST difference between most of the TT turbos out there.
i know what the 26/27 is capable of and i doubt the B4 turbos would be much more than them. but they would probably be better at spooling up earlier.
......................................
#10
Posted 06 August 2011 - 01:46 AM
The VF26/VF27 combo will 'out flow' the VF33/32.I know this has probably been covered before but I've searched and can't find a good answer.
Which set of turbo is bigger or higher flow capacity, adm 32/33 or jdm 26/27?
The VF26/27 run matched wheel sets (comp and turbine).These turbos have the 8 blade high performance turbine wheels (less weight with higher exhaust flow and top end run out)
Comparing primary turbos:
VF26 has larger compressor wheel (37/48mm) than the VF33 (35.6/47mm).
VF26 has P14 turbine A/R compared to the P11 for the VF33 (VF33 will come on boost earlier but will restrict exhaust before the VF26)
VF26 has the lighter less restrictive 6200 or 8 blade turbine wheel compared to the 4600 or 9 blade VF33
Both turbo CHRAs use (high drag) sleeve bearings.
Both turbos use superback,saw tooth design 6/6 compressor wheels designed for high boost applications.
Comparing secondary turbos:
The VF32 uses a straight 10 blade less efficient flatback (36.5/52.5) comp wheel.
The VF27 use (37/48mm) superback,saw tooth design 6/6 compressor wheels designed for high boost applications
VF27 has the lighter less restrictive 6200 or 8 blade turbine wheel compared to the 4600 or 9 blade VF32
Both turbos CHRAs use twin race ball bearing.
Both turbos have P18 turbine A/Rs.
My recommendation would be to keep your existing turbos and improve upon the intial response of the VF26.
This can be achieved by converting the VF26 from sleeve to a ball bearing turbo.Purchase a VF27 and have the CHRA swapped into the VF26.
If you wish to use a VF33 primary the compressor intake can be milled down from 60mm to 50mm and will fit up nicely.This will save swapping the intact out.
Liberty B4 2002 BE5 Rev E 2.5L BITURBO TF035HL-14GXT E85
#11
Posted 06 August 2011 - 12:02 PM
Is it possible to simply get a 27/32 cartridge and bolt onto it the vf26 turbine,compresser and housings? Or is the shafts of the bb vs thrust bearing turbos different?
#12
Posted 08 August 2011 - 03:01 AM
To improve the rate rise of the VF26 convert to a BB with straight swap of the CHRA (cartridge)from a VF27 onlyWow, thats a pretty good answer. So is there any advantages at all to the 32/33? I think subaru used the 32/33 on their sti legacy, so there must be some advantages to them...?
Is it possible to simply get a 27/32 cartridge and bolt onto it the vf26 turbine,compresser and housings? Or is the shafts of the bb vs thrust bearing turbos different?
Alternative to this is a primary VF25 same as a VF26 turbo with a turbine of P12.This would be as good a choice if not better than a VF33 plus easy fit.
Liberty B4 2002 BE5 Rev E 2.5L BITURBO TF035HL-14GXT E85
#13
Posted 08 August 2011 - 07:56 PM
'04 Liberty GT Premium "The Sprog Chariot"
#14
Posted 19 August 2011 - 09:42 PM
Or would that just be stupid? I have a set of 32/33 turbos here, I could make a BB vf33 using the 32 core?
#15
Posted 19 August 2011 - 10:50 PM
For optimization of the turbos you have, I would swap the VF27 BB core into the VF26 for the primary and use the VF32 secondary.What about using a vf33 primary and a vf27 secondary combo?
Or would that just be stupid? I have a set of 32/33 turbos here, I could make a BB vf33 using the 32 core?
Liberty B4 2002 BE5 Rev E 2.5L BITURBO TF035HL-14GXT E85
#16
Posted 31 August 2011 - 10:57 PM
Reason i ask is ive looked at them side by side and they looked the same. although maybe its an optical illusion as the intake is bigger?
i didnt have anything to measure them with at the time.
......................................
#17
Posted 01 September 2011 - 01:09 AM
Hand measured using digital calipers.zanzaraha are these measurements taken in person or from forum?
Reason i ask is ive looked at them side by side and they looked the same. although maybe its an optical illusion as the intake is bigger?
i didnt have anything to measure them with at the time.
The turbo codes can also confirm the variation in the compressor wheel inducer size ie: between VF27 and VF33
Liberty B4 2002 BE5 Rev E 2.5L BITURBO TF035HL-14GXT E85
#18
Posted 01 September 2011 - 01:18 AM
MY02 LIBERTY B4 - LAST DYNO'D @ 375.4KW-ATW 403.5KW-ATW
Next Dyno will be 400+
#19
Posted 01 September 2011 - 09:27 AM
#20
Posted 15 January 2012 - 08:53 AM
Stick with the 33/32 combo and have them ported along with the ECV
where would one go to get this done
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users