cold air intake?
#21
Posted 10 October 2012 - 02:09 PM
#22
Posted 10 October 2012 - 02:33 PM
Wow memories of what my old engine used to look like lol
Wait... Used to? Isn't yours just a stock RX?
They were alloy intercooler bends painted black morgz
Well there you go!
#23
Posted 10 October 2012 - 02:42 PM
YeeessssWait... Used to? Isn't yours just a stock RX
Its amazing how much pull the rx engines have lol
#24
Posted 10 October 2012 - 03:38 PM
..........I've seen several threads on here where people who have done a simple CAI; removing the resonators, and not necesarily directing the pipe into the guard, claiming a positive effect upon fuel economy.. I'd say that's reason enough to do it and then to test out any change
I did this mod many years ago when I had the gen3. I thought at the time that changing the resonator out for direct piping provided marginal economy gains.
Then I changed back to the OEM resonator. No difference at all in economy. I was living in placebo effect land.
Therefore: Direct air feed mod on an NA is a fun mod that creates a small amount of induction noise, but provides no gains in fuel economy or performance.
Why? The OEM feed is not restrictive and already supplies as much air as the engine is able to suck in.
#25
Posted 10 October 2012 - 11:10 PM
Make sure you do an ECU reset after the install!
Dyno results of factory intake versus aftermarket for BRZ (4hp gain without tune) --->
http://blog.perrinpe...gn-and-proving/
#26
Posted 10 October 2012 - 11:32 PM
#27
Posted 10 October 2012 - 11:37 PM
you wouldn't notice 4hp (thats what, maybe 3 kw's) .... when i had mine the only thing i noticed was a slight increase in throttle response.
A gain is a gain, whether its noticeable or not! I had one on my Honda prelude back in the day, and it improved throttle response.
#28
Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:00 AM
Subyclub, The place where random internet weirdos become good mates
#29
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:08 AM
One guy got an extra 50-100kms on average...I did this mod many years ago when I had the gen3. I thought at the time that changing the resonator out for direct piping provided marginal economy gains.
Then I changed back to the OEM resonator. No difference at all in economy. I was living in placebo effect land.
Therefore: Direct air feed mod on an NA is a fun mod that creates a small amount of induction noise, but provides no gains in fuel economy or performance.
Why? The OEM feed is not restrictive and already supplies as much air as the engine is able to suck in.
Perhaps an ECU reset was needed in your case?
idk..just speculation
Forester thread: http://www.subyclub....forester-xt-04/
Liberty wagon: http://www.subyclub....-liberty-wagon/
#30
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:33 AM
One guy got an extra 50-100kms on average...
#31
Posted 11 October 2012 - 09:52 AM
Forester thread: http://www.subyclub....forester-xt-04/
Liberty wagon: http://www.subyclub....-liberty-wagon/
#32
Posted 11 October 2012 - 10:03 AM
#33
Posted 11 October 2012 - 03:29 PM
2. An extra 50 to 100 k's? No way?
3. Hot air from the engine bay? The only hot air is from those that make claims such as those above.
I'm not sure how better to explain this....
Adding a direct feed to an NA EJ25 is not a "cold air intake mod" it already has this mod from factory with the addition of a resonator to cut down induction noise.
It will simply not give you any performance or economy gains.
Do it for fun and noise, absolutely, not for chasing power or economy.
#34
Posted 11 October 2012 - 03:39 PM
It's a fun cheap mod. Go for it! I did and so have many others. It will not harm you or your car but as many have said, don't expect any power gains.
You may get slightly better throttle response and find that it revs easier in the lower rev range but that is simply because you've taken out an air flow restriction. Even that is absolutely minimal and after a day of driving, you'll forget about it!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users