General Thread - Closed! Please use newer GT
#24061
Posted 08 October 2010 - 08:11 AM
#24062
Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:23 AM
#24063
Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:37 AM
#24065
Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:51 AM
Because a thousand million is a billion. So. Yer. Seventeen billion.
What I'm getting at here is that they're asking for nearly double what they are making. Even WA hovers just above $20B/pa.
#24066
Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:54 AM
Anyone know? It's not really my area of expertise. I probably knew the answer in year 9 or something though.
#24067
Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:58 AM
It's Friday.
#24068
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:01 AM
#24069
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:07 AM
NSW still has a higher GSP than any other state per annum over all its just that when it comes to per capita we loose out, and we spend more than we makeSo, $17B? Yes? Or is it more. That's $17B I think?
Because a thousand million is a billion. So. Yer. Seventeen billion.
What I'm getting at here is that they're asking for nearly double what they are making. Even WA hovers just above $20B/pa.
Holy shit! that pic is tasty as
#24070
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:13 AM
#24071
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:14 AM
The NSW economy is larger than each of the national economies of South Africa, Thailand, Malaysia, Colombia, the Philippines and Ukraine. [1] despite them all having a substantially larger population than New South Wales.
BTW yeah it should be done per capita - as the Population of WA increases watch them GSP per capita crash.
#24072
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:23 AM
#24073
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:25 AM
How low is it?
Very.
I'll take a picture tonight of how it sits now, then another one after I raise it back to "legal" height next week.
Then another few after I get the new wheels and fiddle around with height, camber etc.
...that was weird. Actually calling someone on here Luke and it being their real name?!
You've got a 1st name as your surname - your the weird one fella!!
2002 Outback - it's gone...
#24074
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:26 AM

#24075
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:29 AM
I cannot even begin to tell you how illegal that labelling would be if it were produced in Australia. Very cool though, very cool. Picture of B.Cousins springs to mind.
#24076
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:29 AM
Yeah man that was direct copy and paste LOL aint hiding nothing.Are you just Wiki'ing this? That tell tale [1] leads to me to believe that you are.
but the last part was my words.
WA bases pretty much its entire economy on digging shit out of the ground - the amount they dig is likely to stay stable over the years (confirmed by Kellz BF who works in the mines) so as the population of WA increases the GSP is likely to not increase at the same rate and will eventually bring it inline with the rest of Aus (long long term)... so until then enjoy having a population with an above average income or stop people moving there LOL.
Would that label be illegal because it encourages having fun?
#24077
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:30 AM
Are you just Wiki'ing this? That tell tale [1] leads to me to believe that you are.
Haha if you google " [1] despite them all having a substantially larger population than New South Wales." it takes you straight to the wiki page he copy/pasta from
Ugh i could ramble on for forking days about this stuff.
#24078
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:31 AM
You've got a 1st name as your surname - your the weird one fella!!
Thats not my surname, just my middle name.
This guy has two first names
#24079
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:37 AM
NSW was the only state last year to decline in expenditure (you cheap fucks) but what does it really mean.
My initial point was that NSW is asking for nearly $30B of fed funding, when they are clearing just over $17B. I'm sure this is the same for all states? Shit, there's no such thing as a 'small' road project in WA now is there!!
#24080
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:41 AM

Worlds fastest!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users





This topic is locked







