Anyone else finds that this upsets them?
Subaru Australia tell me that it's normal to rev high when cold and hot at idle.
I hate it!
I don't suppose has anyone found a way to fix it?
sssub.jpg 73.22KB
8 downloads
Posted 31 July 2011 - 02:20 PM
sssub.jpg 73.22KB
8 downloads
Posted 31 July 2011 - 02:54 PM
Posted 31 July 2011 - 03:10 PM

Posted 31 July 2011 - 04:08 PM
Ugh i could ramble on for forking days about this stuff.
Posted 31 July 2011 - 04:18 PM
Posted 31 July 2011 - 04:30 PM
Oh that will be good if he sees this thread!Judgeme has an MY11 RS from memory...
Posted 31 July 2011 - 04:32 PM
Auto or manual?
Ugh i could ramble on for forking days about this stuff.
Posted 31 July 2011 - 04:42 PM
Oh that will be good if he sees this thread!
Posted 31 July 2011 - 05:00 PM
A thread going for high revs?Just had a quick look and it doesn't look like he has a thread going??
Thanks,, I'll PM him.Here's his profile though if you want to shoot him a PM.
Auto.....aprox 2,300 when cold.....1,200 when hot. All new Subarus after 2008 have high idle speed revs.Might be worth answering the other guy's questions too... how high is too high and what trans have you got? Could help with the diagnosis
Posted 31 July 2011 - 05:02 PM
Ugh i could ramble on for forking days about this stuff.
Posted 31 July 2011 - 05:28 PM
Out of interest, do the rev's drop if you knock it into neutral instead of D?

Get out of my thread.
Posted 31 July 2011 - 05:57 PM
Subyclub, The place where random internet weirdos become good mates
Posted 31 July 2011 - 06:12 PM
Posted 31 July 2011 - 06:26 PM
MY07 GT spec B
Posted 01 August 2011 - 08:17 AM

Posted 01 August 2011 - 08:39 AM
Cool..........its good to see someone on here with the same car
Well, I'm comparing the idle revs to my older Liberty.I have never really looked twice at the idol revs but they have never seemed too high to me.
1.8K is far too high for me.When i jumped in my car this morning, initially for a second or 2 the reves where just above 2K, then they slowly went down to approx 1.8K
Posted 01 August 2011 - 08:40 AM
Ugh i could ramble on for forking days about this stuff.
Posted 01 August 2011 - 09:50 AM
It was good on my Liberty auto!I'm pretty sure engine braking on an auto box will be pretty non-existant.
Posted 01 August 2011 - 10:10 AM
Cool..........
![]()
Well, I'm comparing the idle revs to my older Liberty.
1.8K is far too high for me.
Also engine braking is not as good because the revs are too high at idle. When I go down a hill and take my foot off the throttle , the car won't slow down with engine braking alone and I have to apply the brakes more often then I has to with my old Liberty.
There's many other things I don't like about the high revs in idle.
When you try and put your car in reverse with you manual transmission, the revs at idle are too high so the syncros in your gearbox are working harder to try and engage reverse. That's why you find it hard to engage reverse. This would not happen if your idle revs dropped down to a sensible 600 rpms.

Posted 01 August 2011 - 10:37 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users