If my memory serves me correctly - it recommends use of 95 octane but says that 91 octane is also okay to use.check your manual i'm sure my wagon said it wanted 95 octane...
What Fuel do you use?
#21
Posted 09 November 2009 - 05:01 PM
#22
Posted 09 November 2009 - 05:03 PM
#23
Posted 09 November 2009 - 05:12 PM
#24
Posted 09 November 2009 - 05:16 PM
#25
Posted 09 November 2009 - 07:51 PM
If I told you I was a compulsive liar, would you believe me?
#26
Posted 09 November 2009 - 08:34 PM
#27
Posted 09 November 2009 - 09:01 PM
OEM+
#28
Posted 09 November 2009 - 09:32 PM
Do all of the Mobil Stations have that? Sounds good
I havn't been to any servos in the burbs that don't have it.
Although in some of the more dingey mobils the card machine does not always work.
I've got 2 on my way home from work, if the first one won't work then i just drive down the road to the next mobil.
Takes like 2 mins to fill and pay for
#29
Posted 09 November 2009 - 10:32 PM
#30
Posted 09 November 2009 - 10:39 PM
Alex, have you gotten to the bottom of that O2 sensor issue you were having. Was reading about it on RSLC but haven't stayed up to date with it.Fouled my oxygen sensor.
And how do you know it was the fuel that buggered it?
#31
Posted 09 November 2009 - 10:47 PM
#32
Posted 09 November 2009 - 11:00 PM
Thats interesting to note; I wouldn't have thought the fuel would have made a difference to the O2 sensor readings. I'd love it if that fixed my problems...Replaced O2 Sensor for a brand new one.
Same code after trying to clear it, but no CEL.
ECUDataScanner says 0.00 - 0.10v. Exactly the same when the CEL was thrown originally.
Since tanking up with Caltex, and only driving 50kms, it has increased to 0.12v, then 0.14v, and now 0.16v. Positive improvement. (in a turbo car, o2 sensor is only read when car is off boost... on boost, the o2 sensor is ignored.)
If it can go up to 0.30v, i'll be a happy chappy, as it's in the normal 02 sensor range according to previous observations on the ECUDataScanner.
If it gets up to that, I can then clear that code, and be code free.
I haven't got as far as checking the wiring yet, but I have crimped my connections firmly, and have heat-shrunk the connections. The wiring job I have done is impeccable.
On mine, a fault was found in the wiring from the O2 sensor to the ECU by a third party mechanic/auto electrician and as a result it may have buggered up this cars 3rd O2 sensor this year. Voltage readings are very weak (<0.10v IIRC). Currently tossing up whether to buy a new one...wallet hates me.
//excuse the off topic...
Walts - they're dissin your threadThe B4 says "Minimum 98 Ron" Inside the fuel cap
I wonder how it would run with 91
#33
Posted 10 November 2009 - 12:16 AM
I recently had a bad experience with BP fuel.
I used to use it religiously, but to tell you the truth, I felt my car ran better on Caltex98 and Mobil 8000.
With this very recent bad experience with BP, I'll never use it again. Yeah, it wasn't a servo I frequent, but still, I feel that the car doesn't run as well as it does the others.
Fouled my oxygen sensor.
I'm recovering slowly with better fuel from Caltex now.
Shell I won't touch with a fifty foot pole (unless the other end of the pole was set alight)
This intrigues me Alex.
I was mucking around with fuels in the commonwhore and tried Caltex 98. Soon after I experienced a rough idle for a few seconds just after start up first thing in the morning. All other starts for the day were fine.
First thought was a leaky injector, but I had just cleaned and serviced them. The flow and leak tests were perfect.
Next tank it got Caltex 92 and the fault disappeared.
Mmmmmmmmm
Next tank, Caltex 98 and the fault returned so I pulled the plugs before startup one morning and they were ALL wet with fuel.
For some reason this fuel leaks past the injectors.
In the Liberty it's fine.
Why?
I have no idea.
I would prefer to use BP but they don't offer the 4c off.
This saves me around $5 per fortnight.
If I told you I was a compulsive liar, would you believe me?
#34
Posted 10 November 2009 - 08:26 AM
This intrigues me Alex.
I was mucking around with fuels in the commonwhore and tried Caltex 98. Soon after I experienced a rough idle for a few seconds just after start up first thing in the morning. All other starts for the day were fine.
First thought was a leaky injector, but I had just cleaned and serviced them. The flow and leak tests were perfect.
Next tank it got Caltex 92 and the fault disappeared.
Mmmmmmmmm
Next tank, Caltex 98 and the fault returned so I pulled the plugs before startup one morning and they were ALL wet with fuel.
For some reason this fuel leaks past the injectors.
In the Liberty it's fine.
Why?
..
I have no idea.
I would prefer to use BP but they don't offer the 4c off.
This saves me around $5 per fortnight.
Have any of you guys tried some of the bioethanol blends?
#35
Posted 10 November 2009 - 08:56 AM
If I told you I was a compulsive liar, would you believe me?
#36
Posted 10 November 2009 - 09:08 AM
#37
Posted 10 November 2009 - 09:22 AM
If I told you I was a compulsive liar, would you believe me?
#38
Posted 10 November 2009 - 09:38 AM
#39
Posted 10 November 2009 - 09:45 AM
Why did they detune the version they sold in Oz
As I understand it the B4 was 'detuned' to run our crappy fuel
Same here Volvo, Saab and a few other euro cars are the only ones for E85.
Oh, and the V8 Supercars. Our local saloon racecar (taxi?) series.
If I told you I was a compulsive liar, would you believe me?
#40
Posted 10 November 2009 - 09:55 AM
Most of my mates that have JDM cars have all switched over to the E5, even the VTEC drivers.. Its about 4 cents a litre more expensive than regular and my missus always asks why i go to the same servo all the time and pay the extra money and i point at the advertising sign stating that its kinder to the enviroment because its part bio fuel, dont mention the more power bit She is scared of my car enough already..
We get most of your saloon racing series over here,(v8 supercars i assume) Bathhurst is the best race of the year. I watch it every year.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users